Welcome to the Degree Doctor blog - structured, practical guidance for qualitative PhD researchers.
If you’ve ever looked at your work and thought, “This isn’t quite coming together…”
If you’ve done the reading, but still feel unsure how to translate it into clear, confident writing.
If you’re making progress, but not in a way that feels coherent or fully convincing.
You’re not lacking ability - you’re working within a process that is rarely made visible.
This blog focuses on the points where qualitative PhDs most often slow down - literature reviews that lose shape, discussion chapters that feel difficult to articulate, methodology decisions that are hard to justify, and the ongoing pressure of working at doctoral level without clear structure.
Each blogpost is designed to help you think more clearly, work more deliberately, and move your research forward with greater confidence.
You’ll find guidance on:
Structuring and writing your thesis with clarity
Developing stronger critical analysis and contribution
Refining your conceptual and theoretical foundations
Making sense of qualitative methodology and interpretation
Managing the intellectual and psychological demands of doctoral research
You can explore by category below, or start with the latest posts.
The aim is not to do more - it is to work with greater clarity, stronger reasoning, and a more structured approach - so your PhD becomes something you can explain, defend, and complete with confidence.
Reflexive Thematic Analysis: A practical step-by-step guide for qualitative PhD researchers
Staring at transcripts and unsure how to turn them into themes? This step-by-step guide to Braun and Clarke’s Reflexive Thematic Analysis explains how to code, construct themes, and write up with clarity and confidence.
How to build strong themes in Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis
Staring at 200 codes and wondering how to turn them into actual themes? This guide breaks down how to move from messy coding to clear, defensible themes in Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis - without second-guessing yourself.
How to write up your Braun and Clarke Reflexive Thematic Analysis (without losing your mind)
Writing up Braun and Clarke’s reflexive thematic analysis? Here’s how to structure your findings chapter clearly, interpret confidently, and show doctoral-level rigour.
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis in a Qualitative PhD: A beginner’s guide to IPA
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) can sound intimidating, but it’s fundamentally about exploring how people make sense of meaningful experiences. This beginner’s guide explains when to use IPA and how the analysis process works.
Constructivist Grounded Theory - A simple introduction to Kathy Charmaz’s approach
Confused by constructivist grounded theory? This beginner-friendly guide explains Kathy Charmaz’s approach to qualitative research in simple terms - from coding to theory development.
What goes in a qualitative PhD findings chapter? Should you refer back to the literature, or leave that for the discussion?
Not sure what belongs in your findings chapter, or whether to include literature? This blogpost helps qualitative PhD researchers structure their findings with clarity and confidence.
Writing a Qualitative PhD Discussion Chapter: A clear structure that actually works
The qualitative PhD discussion chapter is where many researchers freeze - not because they lack ability, but because it’s unclear how to turn findings into a coherent argument. This post gives a calm structure for connecting findings to literature and theory, making your contribution visible, and avoiding repetition or overclaiming.